Epidemic Influenza
And Vitamin D
Date: 15 Sep 2006 - 0:00 PDT
In early April of 2005, after a particularly rainy spring, an
influenza epidemic (epi: upon, demic: people) exploded through the
maximum-security hospital for the criminally insane where I have
worked for the last ten years. It was not the pandemic (pan: all,
demic: people) we all fear, just an epidemic. The world is waiting and
governments are preparing for the next pandemic. A severe influenza
pandemic will kill many more Americans than died in the World Trade
Centers, the Iraq war, the Vietnam War, and Hurricane Katrina
combined, perhaps a million people in the USA alone. Such a disaster
would tear the fabric of American society. Our entire country might
resemble the Superdome or Bourbon Street after Hurricane Katrina.
It's only a question of when a pandemic will come, not if it will
come. Influenza A pandemics come every 30 years or so, severe ones
every hundred years or so. The last pandemic, the Hong Kong flu,
occurred in 1968 - killing 34,000 Americans. In 1918, the Great Flu
Epidemic killed more than
500,000 Americans. So many millions died in other countries, they
couldn't bury the bodies. Young healthy adults, in the prime of their
lives in the morning, drowning in their own inflammation by noon,
grossly discolored by sunset, were dead at midnight. Their body's own
broad-spectrum natural antibiotics, called antimicrobial peptides,
seemed nowhere to be found. An overwhelming immune response to the
influenza virus - white blood cells releasing large amounts of
inflammatory agents called cytokines and chemokines into the lungs of
the doomed - resulted in millions of deaths in
1918.
As I am now a psychiatrist, and no longer a general practitioner, I
was not directly involved in fighting the influenza epidemic in our
hospital. However, our internal medicine specialists worked overtime
as they diagnosed and treated a rapidly increasing number of stricken
patients. Our Chief Medical Officer quarantined one ward after another
as more and more patients were gripped with the chills, fever, cough,
and severe body aches that typifies the clinical presentation of
influenza A.
Epidemic influenza kills a million people in the world every year by
causing pneumonia, "the captain of the men of death." These epidemics
are often explosive; the word influenza comes from Italian (Medieval
Latin ?nfluentia) or influence, because of the belief that the sudden
and abrupt epidemics were due to the influence of some
extraterrestrial force. One seventeenth century observer described it
well when he wrote, "suddenly a Distemper arose, as if sent by some
blast from the stars, which laid hold on very many together: that in
some towns, in the space of a week, above a thousand people fell sick
together."
I guess our hospital was under luckier stars as only about 12% of our
patients were infected and no one died. However, as the epidemic
progressed, I noticed something unusual. First, the ward below mine
was infected, and then the ward on my right, left, and across the hall
- but no patients on my ward became ill. My patients had intermingled
with patients from infected wards before the quarantines. The nurses
on my unit cross-covered on infected wards. Surely, my patients were
exposed to the influenza A virus. How did my patients escape infection
from what some think is the most infectious of all the respiratory
viruses?
My patients were no younger, no healthier, and in no obvious way
different from patients on other wards. Like other wards, my patients
are mostly African Americans who came from the same prisons and jails
as patients on the infected wards. They were prescribed a similar
assortment of powerful psychotropic medications we use throughout the
hospital to reduce the symptoms of psychosis, depression, and violent
mood swings and to try to prevent patients from killing themselves or
attacking other patients and the nursing staff. If my patients were
similar to the patients on all the adjoining wards, why didn't even
one of my patients catch the flu?
A short while later, a group of scientists from UCLA published a
remarkable paper in the prestigious journal, Nature. The UCLA group
confirmed two other recent studies, showing that a naturally occurring
steroid hormone - a hormone most of us take for granted - was, in
effect, a potent antibiotic. Instead of directly killing bacteria and
viruses, the steroid hormone under question increases the body's
production of a remarkable class of proteins, called antimicrobial
peptides. The 200 known antimicrobial peptides directly and rapidly
destroy the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including the
influenza virus, and play a key role in keeping the lungs free of
infection. The steroid hormone that showed these remarkable antibiotic
properties was plain old vitamin D.
All of the patients on my ward had been taking 2,000 units of vitamin
D every day for several months or longer. Could that be the reason
none of my patients caught the flu? I then contacted Professors
Reinhold Vieth and Ed Giovannucci and told them of my observations.
They immediately advised me to collect data from all the patients in
the hospital on 2,000 units of vitamin D, not just the ones on my
ward, to see if the results were statistically significant. It turns
out that the observations on my ward alone were of borderline
statistical significance and could have been due to chance alone.
Administrators at our hospital agreed, and are still attempting to
collect data from all the patients in the hospital on 2,000 or more
units of vitamin D at the time of the epidemic.
Four years ago, I became convinced that vitamin D was unique in the
vitamin world by virtue of three facts. First, it's the only known
precursor of a potent steroid hormone, calcitriol, or activated
vitamin D. Most other vitamins are antioxidants or co-factors in
enzyme reactions. Activated vitamin D - like all steroid hormones -
damasks the genome, turning protein production on and off, as your
body requires. That is, vitamin D regulates genetic expression in
hundreds of tissues throughout your body. This means it has as many
potential mechanisms of action as genes it damasks.
Second, vitamin D does not exist in appreciable quantities in normal
human diets. True, you can get several thousand units in a day if you
feast on sardines for breakfast, herring for lunch and salmon for
dinner. The only people who ever regularly consumed that much fish are
peoples, like the Inuit, who live at the extremes of latitude. The
milk Americans depend on for their vitamin D contains no naturally
occurring vitamin D; instead, the U. S. government requires fortified
milk to be supplemented with vitamin D, but only with what we now know
to be a paltry 100 units per eight-ounce glass.
The vitamin D steroid hormone system has always had its origins in the
skin, not in the mouth. Until quite recently, when dermatologists and
governments began warning us about the dangers of sunlight, humans
made enormous quantities of vitamin D where humans have always made
it, where naked skin meets the ultraviolet B radiation of sunlight. We
just cannot get adequate amounts of vitamin D from our diet. If we
don't expose ourselves to ultraviolet light, we must get vitamin D
from dietary supplements.
The third way vitamin D is different from other vitamins is the
dramatic difference between natural vitamin D nutrition and the modern
one. Today, most humans only make about a thousand units of vitamin D
a day from sun exposure; many people, such as the elderly or African
Americans, make much less than that. How much did humans normally
make? A single, twenty-minute, full body exposure to summer sun will
trigger the delivery of 20,000 units of vitamin D into the circulation
of most people within 48 hours. Twenty thousand units, that's the
single most important fact about vitamin D. Compare that to the 100
units you get from a glass of milk, or the several hundred daily units
the U. S. government recommend as "Adequate Intake." It's what we call
an "order of magnitude" difference.
Humans evolved naked in sub-equatorial Africa, where the sun shines
directly overhead much of the year and where our species must have
obtained tens of thousands of units of vitamin D every day, in spite
of our skin developing heavy melanin concentrations (racial
pigmentation) for protecting the deeper layers of the skin. Even after
humans migrated to temperate latitudes, where our skin rapidly
lightened to allow for more rapid vitamin D production, humans worked
outdoors. However, in the last three hundred years, we began to work
indoors; in the last one hundred years, we began to travel inside
cars; in the last several decades, we began to lather on sunblock and
consciously avoid sunlight. All of these things lower vitamin D blood
levels The inescapable conclusion is that vitamin D levels in modern
humans are not just low - they are aberrantly low.
About three years ago, after studying all I could about vitamin D, I
began testing my patient's vitamin D blood levels and giving them
literature on vitamin D deficiency. All their blood levels were low,
which is not surprising as vitamin D deficiency is practically
universal among dark-skinned people who live at temperate latitudes.
Furthermore, my patients come directly from prison or jail, where they
get little opportunity for sun exposure. After finding out that all my
patients had low levels, many profoundly low, I started educating them
and offering to prescribe them 2,000 units of vitamin D a day, the U.
S. government's "Upper Limit."
Could vitamin D be the reason none of my patients got the flu? In the
last several years, dozens of medical studies have called attention to
worldwide vitamin D deficiency, especially among African Americans and
the elderly, the two groups most likely to die from influenza. Cancer,
heart disease, stroke, autoimmune disease, depression, chronic pain,
depression, gum disease, diabetes, hypertension, and a number of other
diseases have recently been associated with vitamin D deficiency. Was
it possible that influenza was as well?
Then I thought of three mysteries that I first learned in medical
school at the University of North Carolina: (1) although the influenza
virus exists in the population year-round, influenza is a wintertime
illnesses; (2) children with vitamin D deficient rickets are much more
likely to suffer from respiratory infections; (3) the elderly in most
countries are much more likely to die in the winter than the summer
(excess wintertime mortality), and most of that excess mortality,
although listed as cardiac, is, in fact, due to influenza.
Could vitamin D explain these three mysteries, mysteries that account
for hundreds of thousands of deaths every year? Studies have found the
influenza virus is present in the population year-around; why is it a
wintertime illness? Even the common cold got its name because it is
common in cold weather and rare in the summer. Vitamin D blood levels
are at their highest in the summer but reach their lowest levels
during the flu and cold season. Could such a simple explanation
explain these mysteries?
The British researcher, Dr. R. Edgar Hope-Simpson, was the first to
document the most mysterious feature of epidemic influenza, its
wintertime surfeit and summertime scarcity. He theorized that an
unknown "seasonal factor" was at work, a factor that might be
affecting innate human immunity. Hope-Simpson was a general
practitioner who became famous in the late 1960's after he discovered
the cause of shingles. British authorities bestowed every prize they
had on him, not only because of the importance of his discovery, but
because he made the discovery own his own, without the benefit of a
university appointment, and without any formal training in
epidemiology (the detective branch of medicine that methodically
searches for clues about the cause of disease).
After his work on shingles, Hope-Simpson spent the rest of his working
life studying influenza. He concluded a "seasonal factor" was at work,
something that was regularly and predictably impairing human immunity
in the winter and restoring it in the summer. He discovered that
communities widely separated by longitude, but which shared similar
latitude, would simultaneously develop influenza. He discovered that
influenza epidemics in Great Britain in the 17th and 18th century
occurred simultaneously in widely separated communities, before modern
transportation could possibly explain its rapid dissemination.
Hope-Simpson concluded a "seasonal factor" was triggering these
epidemics. Whatever it was, he was certain that the deadly crop" of
influenza that sprouts around the winter solstice was intimately
involved with solar radiation. Hope-Simpson predicted that, once
discovered, the "seasonal factor" would "provide the key to
understanding most of the influenza problems confronting us."
Hope-Simpson had no way of knowing that vitamin D has profound effects
on human immunity, no way of knowing that it increases production of
broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides, peptides that quickly destroy
the influenza virus. We have only recently learned how vitamin D
increases production of antimicrobial peptides while simultaneously
preventing the immune system from releasing too many inflammatory
cells, called chemokines and cytokines, into infected lung tissue.
In 1918, when medical scientists did autopsies on some of the fifty
million people who died during the 1918 flu pandemic, they were amazed
to find destroyed respiratory tracts; sometimes these inflammatory
cytokines had triggered the complete destruction of the normal
epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract. It was as if the flu
victims had been attacked and killed by their own immune systems. This
is the severe inflammatory reaction that vitamin D has recently been
found to prevent.
I subsequently did what physicians have done for centuries. I
experimented, first on myself and then on my family, trying different
doses of vitamin D to see if it has any effects on viral respiratory
infections. After that, as the word spread, several of my medical
colleagues experimented on themselves by taking three-day courses of
pharmacological doses (2,000 units per kilogram per day) of vitamin D
at the first sign of the flu. I also asked numerous colleagues and
friends who were taking physiological doses of vitamin D (5,000 units
per day in the winter and less, or none, in the summer) if they ever
got colds or the flu, and, if so, how severe the infections were. I
became convinced that physiological doses of vitamin D reduce the
incidence of viral respiratory infections and that pharmacological
doses significantly ameliorate the symptoms of some viral respiratory
infections if taken early in the course of the illness. However, such
observations are so personal, so likely to be biased, that they are
worthless science.
As I waited for the hospital to finish collecting data from all the
patients taking vitamin D at the time of the outbreak - to see if it
really reduced the incidence of influenza - I decided to research the
literature thoroughly finding all the clues in the world's medical
literature that indicated if vitamin D played any role in preventing
influenza or other viral respiratory infections. I worked on the paper
for over a year, writing it with Professor Edward Giovannucci of
Harvard, Professor Reinhold Vieth of the University of Toronto,
Professor Michael Holick of Boston University, Professor Cedric
Garland of U. C., San Diego, as well as Dr. John Umhau of the National
Institute of Health, Sasha Madronich of the National Center for
Atmospheric Research, and Dr. Bill Grant at the Sunlight, Nutrition
and Health Research Center. After numerous revisions, we submitted our
paper to the same widely respected journal where Dr. Hope-Simpson
published most of his work several decades ago.
Epidemiology and Infection, known as The Journal of Hygiene in
Hope-Simpson s day, recently published our paper. The editor,
Professor Norman Noah, knew Dr. Hope-Simpson and helped tremendously
with the paper. In the paper, we detailed our theory that vitamin D is
Hope-Simpson's long forgotten seasonal stimulus." We proposed that
annual fluctuations in vitamin D levels explain the seasonality of
influenza. The periodic seasonal fluctuations in
25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, which cause recurrent and predictable
wintertime vitamin D deficiency, predispose human populations to
influenza epidemics. We raised the possibility that influenza is a
symptom of vitamin D deficiency in the same way that an unusual form
of pneumonia (pneumocystis carinii) is a symptom of AIDS. That is, we
theorized that George Bernard Shaw was right when he said, "the
characteristic microbe of a disease might be a symptom instead of a
cause."
In the paper, we propose that vitamin D explains the following 14
observations:
1. Why the flu predictably occurs in the months following the winter
solstice, when vitamin D levels are at their lowest,
2. Why it disappears in the months following the summer solstice,
3. Why influenza is more common in the tropics during the rainy
season,
4. Why the cold and rainy weather associated with El Nino Southern
Oscillation (ENSO), which drives people indoors and lowers vitamin D
blood levels, is associated with influenza,
5. Why the incidence of influenza is inversely correlated with outdoor
temperatures,
6. Why children exposed to sunlight are less likely to get colds,
7. Why cod liver oil (which contains vitamin D) reduces the incidence
of viral respiratory infections,
8. Why Russian scientists found that vitamin D-producing UVB lamps
reduced colds and flu in schoolchildren and factory workers,
9. Why Russian scientists found that volunteers, deliberately infected
with a weakened flu virus - first in the summer and then again in the
winter - show significantly different clinical courses in the
different seasons,
10. Why the elderly who live in countries with high vitamin D
consumption, like Norway, are less likely to die in the winter,
11. Why children with vitamin D deficiency and rickets suffer from
frequent respiratory infections,
12. Why an observant physician (Rehman), who gave high doses of
vitamin D to children who were constantly sick from colds and the flu,
found the treated children were suddenly free from infection,
13. Why the elderly are so much more likely to die from heart attacks
in the winter rather than in the summer,
14. Why African Americans, with their low vitamin D blood levels, are
more likely to die from influenza and pneumonia than Whites are.
Although our paper discusses the possibility that physiological doses
of vitamin D (5,000 units a day) may prevent colds and the flu, and
that physicians might find pharmacological doses of vitamin D (2,000
units per kilogram of body weight per day for three days) useful in
treating some of the one million people who die in the world every
year from influenza, we remind readers that it is only a theory. Like
all theories, our theory must withstand attempts to be disproved with
dispassionately conducted and well-controlled scientific experiments.
However, as vitamin D deficiency has repeatedly been associated with
many of the diseases of civilization, we point out that it is not too
early for physicians to aggressively diagnose and adequately treat
vitamin D deficiency. We recommend that enough vitamin D be taken
daily to maintain
25-hydroxy vitamin D levels at levels normally achieved through
summertime sun exposure (50 ng/ml). For many persons, such as African
Americans and the elderly, this will require up to 5,000 units daily
in the winter and less, or none, in the summer, depending on
summertime sun exposure.
By: J. J. Cannell
Acknowldegement: We wish to thank Professor Norman Noah of the London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Professor Robert Scragg of
the University of Auckland and Professor Robert Heaney of Creighton
University for reviewing the manuscript and making many useful
suggestions.
-- Dr. John Cannell, Atascadero State Hospital, 10333 El Camino Real,
Atascadero, CA 93422, USA, 805 468-2061, jcannell@dmhash.state.ca.us
-- Professor Reinhold Vieth, Mount Sinai Hospital, Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
-- Dr. John Umhau, Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Studies,
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
-- Professor Michael Holick, Departments of Medicine and Physiology,
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
-- Dr. Bill Grant, SUNARC, San Francisco, CA
-- Dr. Sasha Madronich, Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National
Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
-- Professor Cedric Garland, Department of Family and Preventive
Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
-- Professor Edward Giovannucci, Departments of Nutrition and
Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
http://www.vitamindcouncil.com